Archive

Empathy

The True Beauty of Software: Serving Human Needs

March 5, 2024
Alien tech, Antimatter principle, Article, Attendants, Compassion, Empathy, Philosophy, Product development, Software development, Value
Leave a comment

The True Beauty of Software: Serving Human Needs

“Beauty is only skin deep, but ugly goes clear to the bone.”

~ Thomas Overbury

When pondering what constitutes beautiful software, we might choose to look beyond the mere lines of code on the screen. For genuine beauty in software arises not from technical excellence, but from the extent to which it genuinely serves and aligns with the needs of human beings.

A Deeper Beauty

On the surface, we may admire software having clean, elegant code structure, adhering to best practices and exhibiting visual appeal. But the ancient philosophers taught that true beauty must run deeper than superficial appearances. For software, this deeper beauty emanates from how effectively it enhances human capabilities and experiences in the real world.

Power to Elevate

Well-designed software represents the harmonious weaving of digital capabilities with human need. Just as great art inspires by achieving a personal expression of universal themes, so does beautiful software illuminate core human needs through its delivery of cohesive, purposeful functionality. It allows us to appreciate software’s power to elevate and augment our existence.

Like the Romantic poets extolled, beautiful software can facilitate a transcendent union with something greater than ourselves. When developing with insight into human needs, programmers experience a state of flow, bridging the worlds of bits and people until there is no division between the created software and those it benefits. We become co-creators, using our skills to help bring into being solutions which empower.

Resonant

At the same time, beautiful software must resonate with the depth of human experience. As Buddhist wisdom teaches, true beauty arises through mindfulness, ethical conduct, and pacification of the ego. In beautiful software, we find the development team’s consciousness – their thoughtfulness in attending to folks’ needs, their restraint in avoiding the unneeded, their core values embodied in the system’s behaviours.

Inner Light

Moreover, beautiful software exhibits an inner light not of technical correctness, but of purpose – solving real human needs with clarity and compassion. Its beauty transcends being well-crafted to also being virtuous, ethical and generous in spirit. For its core purpose is selfless service to humanity.

Conclusion

So while we may appreciate the external trappings of high-quality software, true beauty runs deeper – into how well it elevates human potential and adapts seamlessly into the real needs of peoples’ lives. For therein lies the highest achievement, to create not just products, but solutions that illuminate, attend to, and empower the human condition.

That Weird Feeling When Someone Attends to Your Needs

February 29, 2024
Antimatter principle, Article, Attendants, Community, Compassion, Culture change, Empathy, Needs, Organisational Therapy, Psychology, Relationships
Leave a comment

That Weird Feeling When Someone Attends to Your Needs

There is often subtle unease or vulnerability when another person identifies and attends to your emotional or practical needs before you ask. Even as they are attending to you, why might you feel strangely rattled or intruded upon by having your underlying feelings anticipated and met in this way?

Expectations

Part of the strangeness seems to be linked to our expectations around emotional autonomy in relationships. It might be because we assume we must self-manage feelings, not burden others unprompted, and disguise any weakness. So when someone sees through our façades and reaches out with support, it can feel jarringly unfamiliar. There is awkwardness adjusting to a new way of relating where masking distress is no longer accepted or expected.

Self-Image

Additionally, admitting needs may endanger our own resourcefulness or positive self-image. To remain strong and unaffected is easier than acknowledging where we genuinely need empathy or assistance. Conceding our emotional gaps confronts us with difficult realities about ourselves. Having someone respond caringly can dredge up shame before that nurturing registers as comfort. It takes time to overcome our reflexive impulse to deny needs that contradict the identities we aspire to.

Psychological Safety

Beneath the discomfort may also lurk trust issues around vulnerability. Emotions expose our innermost selves. Letting someone in to perceive and attend to that sensitive dimension means lowering barriers and giving up some degree of control. Psychologically, it signals dependence on their benevolence versus total self-sufficiency. With support inevitably comes some loss of authority over how we might want to be perceived. Even caring assistance can seem invasive before safety takes root.

While emotional caretaking intends to heal and bond, the path to welcoming nurture over isolation is not always smooth or instant. The vulnerability of relinquishing façades, acknowledging needs, and opening up to help all disrupt our status quo. By naming these sources of weirdness, perhaps the tensions around receiving compassionate support become less of a bewildering hurdle. Gradually, we learn to receive grace and attend to one another’s emotions without threatening inner resolve or identity. The discomfort slowly fades as emotional interdependence replaces sole self-reliance.

Summary

In essence, the discomfort we may feel when someone attends to our emotional needs often stems from unfamiliarity with true interdependence, unwillingness to show vulnerability, and a cultural overemphasis on extreme self-reliance. We expect to conceal any weakness, deny needing support, and handle distress alone without imposing on others. So when another person perceptively senses unvoiced feelings and reaches out to care for our inner experiences, it can feel weirdly intrusive. Even compassionate emotional caretaking jars notions of autonomy and challenges our reflexes to hide perceived flaws or shortcomings behind façade of capability. Yet suppressing needs creates isolation, and makes it so much more likely our needs will go unmet. Perhaps by better understanding the common strangeness behind receiving others’ attention, we can grow into truer communities where attending to one another’s unspoken needs and hopes is simply what love requires.

Everyone is an Artist in Their Own Medium

January 14, 2024
Article, Empathy
Leave a comment

Everyone is an Artist in Their Own Medium

What qualifies someone as an artist? The typical markers involve mastery of a craft like painting, dance, or sculpture that allows one to generate creative works others recognise as artistic. Yet the legendary psychologist Carl Rogers believed every person has the capacity for creative expression in some medium, no matter how seemingly mundane.

Unconditional Positive Regard

Rogers pioneered an approach centred on Unconditional Positive Regard – valuing all people for who they are, not what they achieve. He knew that to become their optimal selves, people need environments where they feel safe being authentic, not forced to present inauthentic facades. When given complete freedom to channel their distinctive experiences into something personally meaningful, Rogers believed everyone can make art of their lives.

Creative Channels

Rogers was right. Given his compassionate lens, we needn’t be Da Vinci or Mozart to have valid artistic impulses worthy of nurturing. Your medium of choice may not hang in the Tate or top music charts. But unconditionally regarding all personal self-expression as valid gives people permission to turn core passions, however unorthodox, into creative channels that feed the soul.

For example, an amateur chef turns the alchemy of food preparation into his artistry. A devoted parent marshals all her life experience into how she raises her children. An avid football fan pours creative energy into managing his fantasy team. Or a devoted friend channels insight from supporting others into becoming an impactful mentor.

Self-Actualised

When we direct our distinctive personalities and aptitudes into anything that lets us feel self-actualised, we make art of that domain however humble it may be. The key is choosing to take unconditional positive regard to mean that when we pursue our true passions with authenticity, we engage the same creative capacity that enables anyone to make art of their lives, regardless of external judgments or standards.

So today, reflect on what niche aligns with your authentic selfhood and gifts. How could you bring more artistry there by channelling your irreproducible experiences into something you find personally meaningful? For inhabiting fully who we are, not conformity, makes us artists of the domains that matter most to us. That is the craft every human longs to master at heart.

Further Reading

Robinson, K. (2009). The element: How finding your passion changes everything. New York, NY: Penguin.

Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2013). Finding your element: How to discover your talents and passions and transform your life. New York, NY: Penguin.

What is “Caring”?

January 2, 2024
Antimatter principle, Article, Attendants, Caring, Compassion, Culture change, Empathy
Leave a comment

What is “Caring”?

In a world that seems more divided and impersonal each day, it’s easy to lose sight of what it really means to care for one another. But what does it truly mean to care?

At its core, caring is about attending to the needs of others with compassion. Caring people make an effort to understand what others need to live joyful, fulfilling lives. They seek to support people emotionally, physically, and spiritually. Their acts of caring may be large or small – from listening patiently to a friend in need to volunteering at a homeless shelter. But in all cases, caring stems from a genuine concern for the welfare of fellow human beings.

In their book Compassionomics, economists Stephen Trzeciak and Anthony Mazzarelli provide copper-bottomed evidence that caring produces tangible benefits both for givers and receivers alike. Studies show that people who volunteer tend to be healthier and live longer. Compassion training in schools reduces violence and bullying. Caring healthcare professionals have patients with better outcomes. And people who feel cared for are more resilient in the face of trauma and stress. In study after study, caring proves critical for individual and collective wellbeing.

Of course, caring can be challenging. It requires generosity, sacrifice, and emotional intelligence. There are times we must care for people we find difficult. And earnest caring always involves some risk – the risk of rejection, disappointment or loss. But as Trzeciak and Mazzarelli explain, these risks pale next to the regrets of a life spent without meaningful caring connections.

In the end, caring is not about sympathy cards or grand gestures. It is about small acts of service and support, performed consistently and sincerely. Caring is embracing our shared humanity. It is a commitment to be present and helpful in the lives of others. And it is ultimately the bond that enables human flourishing even in hard times.

Is caring important to you? Does giving and receiving of compassion feature in your life? Perhaps if we can recover the simple art of caring for one another, some of the discord in our society will dissipate, leaving more space for the ties that truly matter.

The Evil of Judgement

October 21, 2023
Article, Business, Culture change, Dialogue, Empathy, Organisational effectiveness
Leave a comment

The Evil of Judgement

What Makes Judgement Inherently Evil?

Judgement of individuals can be corrosive to both individual well-being and community cohesion. It’s not just the act but the underlying psychology that makes judgement inherently evil. When we judge, we inherently place ourselves in a position of moral or intellectual superiority. This not only alienates others but also fosters a culture of division, intolerance, and hierarchy.

How Does Judgement Affect Our Interactions?

At its core, judgement distorts the dynamics of any relationship. It can transform a civil discourse into a battleground of egos. People often hesitate to show their true selves, out of fear of judgement. This creates a breeding ground for dishonesty, suppression of feelings, and ultimately, emotional disconnect.

Is Judgement Truly Unavoidable?

Many argue that judgement is a natural part of human cognition. While it’s true that our brains are wired to make quick assessments for survival, this doesn’t justify the social and emotional cost of judging others. Even though it may seem like an inevitable part of human interaction, it’s crucial to question its necessity, impact and consequences.

What Are the Consequences?

The consequences of judgement extend far beyond demotivation and hurt feelings. At an organisational level, judgement can suppress creativity and innovation. When employees fear being judged, they are less likely to take risks or propose new ideas. This not only stifles personal growth but also impedes organisational progress.

The Whole Rotten Edifice of Hierarchical Business Is Founded on Judgement?

In the business world, especially in hierarchical organisations, judgement often serves as the bedrock. But what does that mean for the corporate culture and, ultimately, for innovation and growth?

Hierarchy in business is often perpetuated through judgement. Employees are evaluated, ranked, and placed into various roles based on assessments that are frequently subjective. This system not only enforces a rigid structure but also cultivates an environment where judgement is not just accepted but expected.

In such a setting, employees often find themselves confined to their designated roles and rankings. The fear of negative judgement discourages them from stepping out of their boxes to innovate or take risks. After all, a misstep could lead to harsh critique and, in extreme cases, job loss.

Moreover, this culture of judgement disrupts trust and open communication among team members. People become less inclined to share ideas or express concerns, creating an atmosphere where issues become undiscussable and are swept under the rug rather than addressed. This can lead to long-term problems that are much harder to solve.

The most concerning aspect is that judgement in hierarchical organisations often extends beyond performance to personal characteristics, appearances, or even lifestyle choices, exacerbating division and resentment among staff.

So, when we peel back the layers, we see that the hierarchical structure of business isn’t just facilitated by judgement but is fundamentally founded on it. The question then becomes, can a system built on such shaky and potentially damaging grounds truly be effective in the long run?

Can We Choose a Different Approach?

Choosing a non-judgemental approach doesn’t mean ignoring mistakes or accepting poor behaviour. It means adopting a stance of understanding and empathy. Rather than focusing on criticism, we can focus on constructive dialogue. This paves the way for more meaningful connections and lays the groundwork for a more compassionate organisation.

Concluding Thoughts: Are We Ready to Let Go?

The concept that judgement is inherently evil may be a hard pill to swallow for many. But if we acknowledge the potential harm it causes, both on a personal and societal level, we can begin to seek alternatives. The challenge lies in the conscious unlearning of judgemental habits and the cultivation of a more accepting and open perspective. Are we ready to let go? The answer to that question might very well shape the future of our interpersonal relationships, business organisations, and societal norms.

Why Does Telling Fail?

October 10, 2023
Actionable Insights, Antimatter principle, Article, Business, Culture change, Empathy, Listening
Leave a comment

Why Does Telling Fail?

What’s Wrong with Directives?

We often think that conveying information directly is the most effective way to communicate. However, psychology tells us it’s not that straightforward. When we instruct someone, we unknowingly activate psychological mechanisms that can, in fact, make the message less impactful or even counterproductive.

Why Do People Resist?

Human beings have a strong psychological need for autonomy. When we’re told what to do, we may perceive their freedom as being threatened, leading to an automatic response of resistance. This phenomenon is known as psychological reactance. Instead of facilitating change or fostering understanding, the act of telling can often make us dig in our heels.

Does Age Matter?

Contrary to popular belief, reactance isn’t limited to rebellious teenagers. Adults are equally prone to resist when they feel that their autonomy is being compromised. In the workplace, for example, managers who rely solely on directives find their teams less engaged and less productive.

Can Telling Be Ineffective?

Not only can telling lead to resistance, but it can also be a flawed method for conveying complex ideas or nuanced perspectives. Simplifying intricate issues into directives often results in misunderstanding, as it strips the topic of its necessary context.

What Happens to Learning?

When someone is told what to do or think, they’re less likely to engage in deep cognitive processes necessary for true understanding. The lack of critical thought and internalisation means that any change is likely to be superficial and temporary.

What Are the Alternatives?

Clearly, the traditional methods of telling or instructing have their limitations. So, what approaches can we employ instead?

Is Active Engagement the Key?

Encouraging people to participate in discussions allows them to feel a sense of ownership over their decisions. Active engagement not only satisfies the need for autonomy but also fosters a deeper understanding of the issues at hand. Caution: How often have we been encouraged to participate in a discussion only to find it mere “engagement theatre”?

How About Empathy?

Understanding the emotional states and perspectives of others can facilitate more effective communication. Empathic approaches may include asking questions to explore someone’s needa and views or using reflective empathic listening to show that you understand their point of view.

A New Way Forward

Telling doesn’t work as effectively as we’d like because it often triggers psychological resistance and fails to convey necessary context. To communicate more effectively, consider using methods that promote active engagement and empathy. These alternative approaches respect the psychological needs of the individual and are likely to lead to more meaningful understanding and change.

Talking About Needs?

October 4, 2023
Antimatter principle, Article, Caring, Compassion, Empathy, Fellowship, Psychology, Relationships
Leave a comment

Talking About Needs?

Life can be a labyrinth of responsibilities, expectations, and emotions. Amidst the maze, it’s easy to lose sight of folks’ fundamental unattended-to needs. Or even that people have more wonderful lives when their needs receive attention – from e.g. friends, family, employers and coworkers.

Broaching these questions with a close friend could be your mutual ticket to helping each other have more wonderful and satisfying lives:

  1. “What Are The Things – If Any – You’d Like to Have Happen (that aren’t happening yet)?”
    Discussing desires and aspirations that haven’t yet come to fruition can open up new possibilities for growth and satisfaction. It could even illuminate areas where friends, etc., can support each other to make life more wonderful.
  2. “What Gives You the Sense That Something Is Missing?”
    This sensation of something being amiss is not uncommon. It’s like a jigsaw puzzle with a missing piece; you can see the overall picture, but in some way it’s incomplete.
  3. “What Differences Do You Notice Between Your Current Life and Something Better?”
    Here’s an opportunity for reflection. There’s often a discrepancy between our lived experiences and our ideal lives. Acknowledging this disparity might help in closing the gap.
  4. “What Needs Haven’t You Shared Out Loud?”
    We all have those unspoken wishes—perhaps because they seem too foolish or unreachable. Yet, acknowledging these can be the first step toward addressing unmet needs or goals.
  5. “What Haven’t You Done Yet?”
    Procrastination, or even just life getting in the way, can keep us from pursuing things we’re passionate about. What’s on your list of ‘somedays’ that you might turn into ‘todays’?
  6. “What Makes You Feel Understood or Misunderstood?”
    The emotional nourishment that comes from being understood is a fundamental human need. If it’s missing, that’s something worth exploring further.
  7. “What Topics Find You Changing the Subject?”
    Sometimes avoidance is the best indicator of significance. Those undiscussable topics or issues you’re sidestepping? They could be precisely where attention is most needed.
  8. “How Do You Feel When You Have to Say No?”
    The difficulty in setting boundaries is often symptomatic of deeper, unattended needs. If you find it challenging to say no, this might be an area worth investigating.
  9. “Where in Your Life Do You Feel Like You’re on Autopilot?”
    Routine can offer comfort, but it can also veil unmet needs. If you find areas of your life running on autopilot, it could be a sign to probe deeper.
  10. “What Emotions Do You Find Yourself Keeping in Check, or Burying?”
    Society often prescribes what emotions are acceptable, causing us to suppress those that aren’t. These suppressed emotions could point to neglected needs or aspects of oneself.

Discussing these questions may not offer quick fixes, but they can pave the way for deeper and more rewarding connections with others. Of course, this all hinges on genuine concern for the people you’re conversing with. Without empathy and compassion, these conversations are vacuous at best.

My Dance with Wu Wei

September 28, 2023
Article, Careers, Empathy, Reflections
Leave a comment

My Dance with Wu Wei

Always in Step with Wu Wei?

Before I even knew the term, my natural way of approaching work and life reflected the essence of Wu Wei—effortless action. It was as if I had been dancing to a rhythm only I could hear, and that rhythm was surprisingly aligned with this ancient Taoist principle. But then came the societal pressures and expectations about what success should look like, and I found myself aware of a different, more frenetic tune: the tune of striving.

The Rhythm of Striving: A Discordant Beat

Flirting with striving was like changing the music mid-dance. The beat was off, the tempo mismatched. Striving to meet expectations and reach ever-higher pinnacles of success seemed like it would be a chore. Each step forced, each move laboured. Over time, the dance of my career transformed into a gaol, where I performed, but the performance was crucifying me emotionally.

Rediscovering My Rhythm

The dissonance became too loud to ignore. The emotional fatigue, the sense of going against the grain, led me to reassess. I’ve rejected the siren song of striving and returned to embracing my original tune. That’s when I reconnected with Wu Wei, giving a name to the style I’d always inherently known.

How the Dance Changed

Once I embraced Wu Wei again, my dance changed. No longer was I trying to keep pace with an alien beat. I found my flow, that place where effort isn’t forced but naturally unfolds. The emotional toll decreased, and in its place came a sense of authentic engagement with all things.

What Does the Dance Look Like Now?

Today, the dance is improvisation, feeling the music and going where it takes me. Opportunities come, not from striving, but from being attuned to the natural flow of events. I still engage, I still act, but I do so in harmony with the world, and with my emotional core.

My dance with Wu Wei has become a central choreography. It brings with it a sense of peace, the emotional richness of being in step with my true self. And interestingly, I find that I have no urge to achieve, no draining emotional exertion. In letting go of forced effort, I’ve found my authentic rhythm, and it’s a dance I intend to continue.

The Nonviolent Communication Advantage in Relationships

September 10, 2023
Antimatter principle, Article, Community, Conversations, Empathy, Nonviolence, Nonviolent Communication, Relationships, Trust
Leave a comment

The Nonviolent Communication Advantage in Relationships

Can NVC Elevate Workplace Relationships?

Nonviolent Communication (NVC) isn’t just a concept; it’s a practice. It consists of observing without judgment, expressing feelings, articulating needs, and making clear requests. In a work environment, these principles can go a long way to build mutual respect and understanding. They promote constructive criticism and foster an open dialogue.

What Does NVC Bring to Group Dynamics?

When it comes to group interactions, NVC shines in its ability to alleviate tension and solve conflict. By focusing on unmet needs instead of blame, NVC creates a constructive pathway to solutions. Teams can navigate disagreements and reach a mutual understanding. In this space, everybody’s needs get a chance to be heard, fostering collaboration and creativity.

Dissolves Tension Through Empathy

One of the most immediate effects of applying NVC in a group setting is the reduction of tension. Often, disagreements escalate because people feel misunderstood or attacked. NVC replaces these barriers with empathy. Team members learn to listen actively and validate each other’s feelings and needs, which in turn lowers emotional walls and facilitates productive dialogue.

Redirects the Focus to Unmet Needs

In traditional models of communication, a point of conflict often leads to a blame game. This not only stifles resolution but can also create animosity within the group. NVC shifts this focus from assigning blame to identifying unmet needs. When group members express what they require instead of blaming others, it encourages a problem-solving mindset. This can lead to more equitable outcomes that respect the needs of all involved.

Enables Mutual Understanding

NVC encourages people to express themselves clearly and concisely, focusing on what they observe, feel, need, and request. This clarity helps group members to better understand each other’s perspectives and constraints. Misunderstandings are resolved more quickly, as the communication becomes more transparent. As everyone gains a more nuanced understanding of each other’s needs and contributions, a deeper mutual respect develops.

Boosts Collaboration and Creativity

Once the groundwork of empathy and understanding is laid, teams find it easier to collaborate. Everyone becomes more invested in each other’s success, setting the stage for more cohesive teamwork. Moreover, as trust within the group increases, members are more willing to share creative ideas without the fear of ridicule or misunderstanding. NVC thus acts as a catalyst for innovation, allowing the collective intelligence of the group to flourish.

Creates an Inclusive Environment

In a group dynamic where NVC is practiced, every voice matters. The inherent respect for each individual’s needs and feelings fosters an inclusive atmosphere. Team members from diverse backgrounds, who may have different styles of communication or varying viewpoints, find it easier to integrate and contribute. This inclusivity not only enriches the group’s overall skill set but also enhances its problem-solving capabilities.

In summary, NVC in group dynamics works as a multifaceted tool. It dissolves tension, redirects focus from blame to needs, fosters mutual understanding, enhances collaboration and creativity, and encourages inclusivity. It’s not just a communication style but a comprehensive approach to improving how groups interact and function.

Do Relationships Outside Work Benefit from NVC?

NVC isn’t just for professional settings. Families, couples, and friends can find value in its principles. In intimate relationships, NVC helps in the articulation of emotional needs and ensures that both parties feel heard and understood. Open, honest communication is encouraged, deepening the emotional connection.

Enhances Emotional Expression

One of the most significant benefits of NVC in personal relationships is that it encourages the open expression of emotions. Traditional communication often falls short in this aspect, making it difficult for individuals to convey what they’re feeling. NVC provides the tools for a more nuanced expression of emotions, eliminating misunderstandings and allowing people to feel genuinely understood by their loved ones.

Fosters Authentic Conversations

Most relationships suffer from a lack of honest and open communication. People often conceal their true feelings to avoid conflict or because they fear judgment. NVC breaks down these barriers by fostering a non-judgmental space where individuals can express their authentic selves. This leads to more meaningful conversations that serve to deepen the relationship.

Resolves Conflicts Harmoniously

Conflict is an inevitable part of any relationship. What sets healthy relationships apart from dysfunctional ones is the ability to resolve these conflicts in a mutually satisfying way. NVC shifts the conflict resolution focus from winning an argument to understanding and meeting the underlying needs of each party involved. The result is a more harmonious resolution that strengthens the relationship rather than erodes it.

Enhances Empathy and Mutual Respect

By focusing on empathetic listening and understanding, NVC cultivates a culture of mutual respect within relationships. Each person learns to appreciate the feelings and needs of the other, which encourages a supportive and nurturing environment. This mutual respect further solidifies the relationship and makes it more resilient in the face of challenges.

Strengthens Emotional Bonds

Last but not least, NVC significantly contributes to strengthening emotional bonds between individuals. When people feel heard and valued, their emotional attachment to each other deepens. Emotional intimacy is crucial for any long-lasting, fulfilling relationship, and NVC provides the framework to achieve this.

To summarise, the influence of NVC extends well beyond professional settings and offers significant advantages in personal relationships. By facilitating emotional expression, authentic conversations, harmonious conflict resolution, empathy, and stronger emotional bonds, NVC serves as a cornerstone for healthier, more fulfilling relationships outside the workplace.

Summary: Is NVC the Relationship Game-Changer?

In both workplace relationships and broader social circles, NVC stands out as an effective tool for building stronger, more open interactions. By focusing on empathy and understanding, it paves the way for improved communication and stronger bonds.

NVC has a far-reaching impact. From conference rooms to living rooms to bedrooms, its principles can transform how we relate to one another. It offers the promise of not just better conversations but also enriched relationships. So, why not give it a try?

Further Reading

Rosenberg, M. B. (2003). Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life. Puddledancer Press.
Rosenberg, M. B. (2005). Speak Peace in a World of Conflict. Puddledancer Press.
Rosenberg, M. B. (2005). The Surprising Purpose of Anger: Beyond Anger Management: Finding the Gift. Puddledancer Press.
Rosenberg, M. B., & Chopra, D. (2006). Words That Work in Business. Puddledancer Press.

I, Relate

September 3, 2023
Article, Capability development, Collaboration, Community, Culture change, Dialogue, Empathy, Joy, Organisational effectiveness, Organisational Therapy, Relationships
Leave a comment

I, Relate

The Unlikely Union: How the Relationship Counselling Ethos Boosts Software Development Productivity

Why Should Techies Care About Relationship Counselling?

At first glance, you might think that relationship counselling and software development occupy opposite ends of the spectrum. Yet, delve a little deeper and you’ll see that both fields share a core essence: human interaction. In a nutshell, successful software development relies on effective communication, collaboration, and conflict resolution, elements that relationship counselling has mastered. Let’s explore how relationship counselling ethos and techniques can turbocharge software development productivity.

The Fabric of Teamwork: Trust and Open Communication

Software development isn’t a one-man show. It involves designers, developers, testers, customers, and often, cross-functional teams from other departments. This melting pot can either cook up an extraordinary result or turn into a recipe for disaster. That’s where relationship counselling principles come into play. Trust-building exercises and open communication channels, often advocated by relationship counselling, can help team members understand and respect each other’s roles, fostering a more cohesive working environment.

Conflict Resolution: The Relationship Counselling Way

Conflicts are part and parcel of any collaboration, let alone software development with its tight deadlines and constant need for problem-solving. Relationship counselling is adept at resolving disputes and finding middle ground, skills that are just as useful in the tech world. Techniques such as active listening and ‘I’ statements can pave the way for constructive discussions, rather than finger-pointing or blame games. This encourages quicker resolution of issues, saving both time and sanity.

Emotional Intelligence: Not Just for Lovers

While emotional intelligence (EQ) might sound like the antithesis of the logic-driven tech sphere, it’s surprisingly crucial. High EQ can enhance problem-solving abilities and contribute to better collaboration. Relationship counselling’s focus on developing emotional intelligence can help team members become more aware of their own reactions and the feelings of others, thereby enhancing overall productivity.

Iterative Improvement: Learning from Relationships

Just like any relationship, software development benefits from periodic check-ins and adjustments. Relationship counselling’s method of iterative feedback and adjustment mirrors prevailing methods in software development. Regular retrospective meetings, a technique in line with relationship counselling’s ethos, allow for continual improvement and adjustment throughout the development life cycle.

The Ripple Effect

Adopting the relationship counselling ethos can have longer-term benefits. Enhanced communication skills, improved conflict resolution abilities, and a heightened emotional intelligence level are not development-specific. They’ll enrich the work environment, thereby leading to better collaborations in the future and stronger, more resilient, more joyful teams.

In Summary

Though it might seem unusual, the relationship counselling ethos offers tangible benefits for software development teams. From trust-building and conflict resolution to fostering emotional intelligence, these techniques can significantly impact productivity. So, the next time you’re stuck in a dev team stand-off or facing a seemingly insurmountable challenge, you might just find the solution in relationship counselling techniques.

Shattering the Shackles of Convention: The Unspoken Subtext of Workplace Location in Job Ads

August 26, 2023
Antimatter principle, Article, Empathy
Leave a comment

Shattering the Shackles of Convention: The Unspoken Subtext of Workplace Location in Job Ads

The location box on a job ad usually offers little room for debate. You’re either in the office, partially remote, or fully remote. Yet this small piece of digital real estate does something extraordinary: it unveils your ethos as an employer. When that box reads “work where you believe it’s best for you and the company both,” you’re sending a message of empathy, autonomy, and consideration. Anything else may unwittingly signal an underlying tone of compulsion, violence, and indifference to employee needs.

The Unsaid Speaks Volumes

The expectation for employees to work at a specific location isn’t just about logistics; it’s about control. Tethering staff to a geographical point suggests a distrust in their capacity to be productive unless observed. It’s not just about ensuring that Sarah from accounts is at her desk by 9 am; it’s an implied statement that employees are less reliable, less effective, and less trustworthy when left to their own devices.

The Veil of Compulsion

When job descriptions indicate a set location without flexibility, there’s an invisible yet entirely obvious layer of compulsion. It’s a mandate rather than an invitation. This constraint disregards the complex tapestry of individual needs, be it family care, mental health, or even the straightforward desire for a better work-life balance. And it also disregards smart people’s desire to work where they can contribute most. You do want to hire smart people, I take it?

A Touch of Violence

Using the word “violence” here may seem dramatic, but what else would you call a system that effectively corners employees into making potentially detrimental choices? There’s a subtle, systemic violence in forcing people into long commutes, into offices that may exacerbate their anxiety or other health conditions, into workplaces that block their productivity, and away from their support systems.

The Apathy Card

Indifference is the silent partner to compulsion and violence in this dynamic. An employer who’s unwilling to consider autonomy in work arrangements is effectively saying, “Your needs don’t matter.” The message is clear: the company’s priorities dwarf those of the individual, a stance that rarely fosters a culture of mutual respect and engagement.

The Elixir: Empathy and Autonomy

When an employer adopts a “work where you believe it’s best for you and the company both” policy, it’s like fresh air flowing through a musty room. It signifies empathy for employees’ diverse situations and an understanding that intelligent, responsible adults can make choices that benefit both themselves and their organisation. Moreover, it boosts morale; when people feel seen and valued, they’re more likely to be engaged, loyal, and productive.

The Bottom Line

The debate around work location isn’t new, but it’s more pertinent than ever in a world that’s rethinking how work should be done. While autonomy in work location won’t suit every company or role, being transparent and considerate about this factor can be a game-changer. When it comes to job ads, sometimes the loudest statements are made in the quietest corners: a few words that demonstrate whether you’re an employer who elevates—or an employer who suppresses. Choose wisely.

Please Yourself!

August 25, 2023
Antimatter principle, Article, Collaboration, Culture change, Empathy
Leave a comment

Please Yourself!

Amid the hustle and bustle of life, the act of tending to others’ needs often gets eclipsed by our individual ambitions. Yet, there’s a profound and enlightening reality that lurks beneath this mundane routine. Catering to the needs of those around us is not just a selfless act; it’s a gateway to our inner satisfaction. Let’s delve into this intricate connection that binds our happiness with the happiness of others.

Pleasing Others, Pleasing Ourselves

At first glance, attending to others’ needs might seem a chore or even a burden. However, scratch beneath the surface, and we can uncover a rich and rewarding experience that resonates with our intrinsic human nature as social animals.

1. Understanding Human Connection

Humans are social beings. We thrive in communities, forging bonds with family, friends, colleagues, and even strangers. When we help others, we’re essentially nurturing these connections, thereby enhancing our own sense of belonging and joy. It’s a symbiotic relationship, where our compassion fuels both our happiness and that of the person to whose needs we’re attending.

2. The Joy of Giving

The pleasure derived from giving is often more rewarding than receiving. When we see the impact our help has on someone’s life, a sense of accomplishment and fulfilment washes over us. It’s not just about solving a problem; it’s about adding value to someone’s life and, in turn, enriching our own existence.

3. The Psychological Perspective

From the viewpoint of organisational psychotherapy, attending to others’ needs within a corporate setting can lead to a more harmonious and productive work environment, witgh increased engaement and discretionary effort. By understanding and fulfilling the needs of colleagues, we foster a sense of trust and cooperation that makes daily work more enjoyable and effective.

4. Building Self-esteem and Confidence

When we help others, we also enhance our sense of self-worth. We see ourselves as capable, compassionate, and valuable. This boost in self-esteem doesn’t just brighten our mood; it adds a layer of resilience to face life’s challenges with confidence.

5. The Moral Compass

Attending to others’ needs aligns with many moral and ethical principles found across various cultures. By doing good for others, we’re living a life congruent with these values, leading to a sense of satisfaction and contentment.

Summary

Attending to others’ needs isn’t just about them; it’s equally about us. It’s a shared journey of joy, understanding, compassion, and fulfilment that enriches life in multifaceted ways. In serving others, we find a reflection of ourselves, and through that reflection, we discover pleasure, purpose, and a profound connection to the world around us.

Let’s not underestimate the power of compassion and empathy. Let’s embrace the pleasure of pleasing others and realise that in the process, we’re indeed pleasing ourselves.

Ego – The Perfect Blocker

August 23, 2023
Article, Business, Empathy, Management, Organisational effectiveness, Organisational Therapy
Leave a comment

Ego – The Perfect Blocker

There’s a saying that wisdom often falls on deaf ears, and nowhere does this seem truer than when broaching the subject of ego with managers. Is it even worth trying to invite them to consider that their ego might be the major blocker to success for their organisations? The common sentiment might lead us to believe that there’s no point in even trying.

The Ego and Its Hold on Managers

In the context of business managers and executives, the term “ego” refers to a person’s sense of self-esteem or self-importance. It’s the part of the mind that mediates between the conscious and unconscious and is responsible for a sense of personal identity and self-confidence. This understanding of ego can be a powerful force in individuals, particularly those in leadership positions. Managers, often under pressure to perform, may become consumed with their sense of self, status, and personal wellbeing.

This focus on self can lead to a lack of openness to criticism or feedback, especially if it’s aimed at something as personal as the ego.

Why Telling Managers Seems Futile

Nobody likes being told anything, and especially when the subject is related to one’s self-image.

  1. Resistance to Criticism: Managers often see themselves as the decision-makers and leaders. Admitting that their ego might be an issue can feel like a personal attack, leading to defensiveness.
  2. Lack of Awareness: Many managers might be unaware of how their ego affects their decisions and the organisation as a whole. Without this awareness, any conversation about ego can seem abstract or irrelevant.
  3. Fear of Vulnerability: Acknowledging that one’s ego is a problem requires a level of vulnerability that many managers may be unwilling or unable to embrace.
  4. The Backfire Effect: Presenting evidence that challenges a manager’s belief or behaviour might cause them to hold on to their views more strongly. This psychological phenomenon further complicates the task of addressing ego in leadership.

A Different Approach: Is There Hope?

While it may seem like a lost cause, there might be ways to address the issue without direct confrontation:

  • Focus on Behaviour, Not Personality: Instead of talking about ego as a personality flaw, focus on specific behaviours – arising from e.g. ego – that might be addressable and changeable.
  • Invite and Support Self-Reflection: Create opportunities for managers to reflect on their actions and how they affect the team. This can lead to organic realisation and change.
  • Build a Culture of Openness: Cultivating a culture where feedback is encouraged and valued can slowly break down barriers and make conversations about ego more acceptable, less uncomfortable.

Summary

While it may seem futile to tell managers that their ego is blocking everyone’s success, it’s not necessarily a lost cause. The approach matters. By focusing on behaviour, encouraging self-reflection, and fostering an open culture, we can pave the way for constructive conversations about ego.

It’s not about pointing fingers or laying blame; it’s about creating an environment where growth and self-improvement are possible. The task is challenging, no doubt, but it’s not one that we should abandon without trying. It requires tact, empathy, and persistence, but the potential rewards for the organisation are well worth the effort.

What’s the Key to a More Wonderful Organisation?

August 15, 2023
Antimatter principle, Business, Culture change, Empathy, Fellowship, Joy, Wonder
Leave a comment

What’s the Key to a More Wonderful Organisation?

Presently, when people ask me what my job entails, I respond with:

“I’m all about making organisations more wonderful”.

By now, many of us are familiar with the manifold benefits of a more wonderful organisation. Environments where trust, joy, connection and personal growth don’t just exist but thrive. But arriving at that point seems to elude even the most dedicated of leaders. So, what’s the key to unlocking this potential? It’s simple, yet profound: The Antimatter Principle. Let’s dive deep into understanding and appreciating its transformative power.

What is the Antimatter Principle?

At its core, the Antimatter Principle is an invitation: to attend to folks’ needs. It sounds so simple, so rudimentary, that you might be tempted to dismiss it. But it’s the linchpin of any successful organisation striving for joy and productivity.

The Need for Needs

The world of business has long been enamoured with terms like ‘efficiency’, ‘productivity’, and ‘optimisation’. While these are not inherently undesirable, they often overshadow the essential human element that fuels any organisation. That human element is predicated on folks’ needs.

Every person within an organisation – from the mailroom to the boardroom – has needs. Customers, shareholders, regulators too have needs. It could be the need for respect, understanding, creativity, autonomy, or simply a listening ear. Attending to these needs isn’t just a tokenistic gesture of goodwill; it’s the fuel that drives joy, motivation, and, paradoxically, productivity.

How to Adopt the Antimatter Principle

1. Listening Empathically

Empathic listening doesn’t mean just nodding in agreement. It means being fully present, devoid of judgments, and truly absorbing what the other person is communicating. Only then can we hope to connect with , let alone meet, their needs.

2. Creating Safe Spaces

Employees must feel safe to express their needs without fear of retribution. An organisation that leverages the Antimatter Principle provides these safe havens where folks can be authentic and vulnerable.

3. Empowering Autonomy

Once you understand a person’s needs, trust them and support them in seeking solutions. This cultivates a sense of ownership and agency, driving innovation and feelings of joy and accomplishment.

4. Prioritising Well-being

Inviting folks to attend to each other’s and their own well-being means that the organisation acknowledges them as real people.Not just drones or cogs. Physical health, mental well-being, and social connections are all integral parts of this equation.

5. Review and Reflect

Invite regular check-ins to ensure that needs are being attended-to and that the organisation is continuously evolving in its application of the Antimatter Principle.

The Transformative Power of Attending to Needs

When needs are attended to, people flourish. A team member who feels valued as a person and heard is more likely to share innovative ideas. One who feels respected will take pride in their work, leading to quality outcomes. The ripple effect of addressing individual needs inevitably results in a collective upswing for the organisation. And people’s innate sense of fairness means the attention is reciprocated towards the organisation and its needs.

Summary

In conclusion, if we aim for a wonderful organisation, a place where joy isn’t just an abstract idea but a lived reality, the roadmap is clear. We must, resolutely and continuously, attend to folks’ needs. By embracing the Antimatter Principle, not only do we make our organisations more wonderful, but we also affirm our commitment to the very heart of what makes those organisations run: the people.

Further Reading

For those intrigued by the idea of creating a ‘wonderful’ organisation, the following resources delve deeper into this topic, providing insights, real-world examples, and strategies:

  1. Joy, Inc.: How We Built a Workplace People Love by Richard Sheridan.
    • Sheridan, R. (2013). Joy, Inc.: How We Built a Workplace People Love. Portfolio.
      In “Joy, Inc.,” Richard Sheridan uncovers the journey of Menlo Innovations, a software design and development company, as they endeavor to create a joy-filled workplace. Sheridan discusses the challenges faced and the radical approaches adopted to foster innovation, teamwork, and – most importantly – joy. This book offers a fascinating look into a successful business that prioritises employee happiness and provides valuable insights for organisations seeking to adopt a similar ethos.

Genuine Empathy in AI?

August 10, 2023
AI, Article, Compassion, Dialogue, Empathy, Listening, Nonviolent Communication, Prompt Engineering
Leave a comment

Genuine Empathy in AI?

In the digital age, with AI permeating human interactions, the call for machines to exhibit genuine empathy becomes not only desirable but essential. As these systems engage with humans in fields ranging from healthcare to customer service, genuine empathy fosters trust, understanding, and human-like connection. Beyond these human-machine interfaces, there’s a burgeoning realm of AI-to-AI interaction and self-reflective AI systems that beckon exploration. To grasp the profound nature and nuances of this empathetic challenge, let’s dive into David Bohm’s holistic consciousness and Marshall Rosenberg’s intricate empathy.

The Rosenbarg Perspective on Empathy

Marshall Rosenberg, the creator of Nonviolent Communication (NVC), had a profound understanding of empathy, which was central to his teachings. NVC is a communication process designed to improve compassionate connection with others, and empathy plays a pivotal role in this process.

For Rosenberg, empathy was more than just understanding someone’s feelings. Here’s how he defined and conceptualised empathy:

  1. Deep, Compassionate Presence: Rosenberg believed that empathy involves being deeply present with someone, without judgment, analysis, or interpretation. This means setting aside our evaluations and simply being with the person, connecting to what they are experiencing in the current moment.
  2. Feeling WITH Someone: Rather than feeling FOR someone (sympathy), empathy, according to Rosenberg, is about feeling WITH them. This involves a deep connection where you’re not just observing or understanding their feelings but genuinely connecting with their emotional state.
  3. Avoiding Advice, Sympathy, or Analysis: One of the distinct aspects of Rosenberg’s definition of empathy is what it’s not. He emphasised that genuine empathy is not about giving advice, offering sympathy, explaining things, or telling stories of our similar experiences. Empathy is about fully being with the other person in their emotional experience. IOW It’s all about them and what they’re feeling.
  4. Understanding the Feeling and Need: In the NVC process, Rosenberg pointed out the importance of identifying and understanding both the feeling and the underlying need of the individual. Empathy, in this context, is about recognising what someone is feeling and what they are needing or longing for that is causing that feeling.
  5. Receiving “from the Heart”: For Rosenberg, empathy was also about “receiving from the heart.” This means connecting with the essence of what the person is saying, beyond the words or the surface level, and truly being with them in their emotional state.
  6. A Way of Being, Not Just Doing: While many view empathy as an action or a response, Rosenberg viewed it as a way of being. It’s not just about doing empathetic things or saying empathetic words, but genuinely embodying a state of compassionate connection with others.

In summary, Marshall Rosenberg’s definition of empathy is deeply rooted in compassionate connection, presence, and understanding. It’s about being fully with someone in their emotional experience, free from judgments or preconceived notions, and connecting with their feelings and needs. This approach to empathy, integral to Nonviolent Communication, offers a profound way to relate to and connect with others.

Interconnected Consciousness and the Depth of Empathy

Bohm’s “undivided wholeness” paints a universe of interconnected consciousness. Rosenberg’s empathy, meanwhile, anchors on compassionate presence, understanding intrinsic feelings and needs without judgment.

In the AI realm, this suggests that for genuine empathy to manifest, machines must not only echo Bohm’s interconnected consciousness but also embody Rosenberg’s deep connection.

Material Thought, AI, and Empathic Being

Bohm saw thoughts as material entities deeply embedded within consciousness. Here lies a challenge: Can AI’s logical, algorithmic processes merge with Rosenberg’s notion of empathy as an emotional state of being? Genuine empathy, for AI, isn’t just about recognising patterns; it’s a plunge into heartfelt connection.

Fragmentation and Genuine Connection

Both luminaries warn against fragmented perceptions. Bohm believes in holistic comprehension, and Rosenberg advocates for deep, undistorted empathy. AI, shaped by human perspectives, must break free from inherited fragmented thinking to truly embrace Rosenberg’s full-spectrum empathy.

Beyond the Surface: The Deep Dive into Emotion

Mirroring Bohm’s multilayered reality, Rosenberg’s empathy probes beneath emotions to the root needs. AI’s challenge is twofold: understand the explicit while journeying into the profound realm of human needs.

AI Dialogues and Emotional Resonance

Open dialogues hold significance in both Bohm’s and Rosenberg’s teachings. For AI to grasp genuine empathy, it must not only partake in these dialogues with humans but resonate emotionally, discerning feelings and needs.

Empathy Between AIs and Self-reflection Within an AI

Moving beyond human-AI interaction, consider the realm where AIs interact amongst themselves. Do they need a form of empathy? Would that be useful?  In AI-to-AI dynamics, empathy can facilitate smoother interactions, helping systems anticipate and complement each other’s operations.

Then there’s introspective AI – systems capable of self-reflection. For a machine to reflect upon its actions and learn autonomously, a form of empathy, understanding its ‘state’ or ‘condition’ in relation to its environment and objectives, could be pivotal. This self-empathy, a blend of Bohm’s interconnectedness and Rosenberg’s depth of feeling, might be the cornerstone for advanced autonomous AI evolution.

Conclusion

Bohm’s and Rosenberg’s intertwined teachings sketch a roadmap for AI’s empathetic journey, covering human interactions, AI interrelations, and machine introspection. This isn’t just a technical endeavor but a deep philosophical quest, navigating interconnected consciousness and the heart of compassionate connection.

Rosenberg and Bohm: A Dialogue on Empathy and Consciousness

Scene: A serene garden setting. Birds chirp in the background. A table is set with two chairs. David Bohm and Marshall Rosenberg sit facing each other, cups of tea in hand.

Bohm: Marshall, I’ve always been fascinated by your perspective on empathy, which resonates with my understanding of the interconnected nature of consciousness. For me, every fragment of the universe is interconnected, a holistic whole.

Rosenberg: David, that’s interesting because empathy, in my view, is also about seeing the interconnectedness of human emotions and needs. It’s about fully connecting with another person’s experience without judgments, just being present with them.

Bohm: Precisely! Our thoughts are material, and they shape and are shaped by this interconnectedness. When we fragment and compartmentalize, we miss out on this wholeness. This mirrors your notion of avoiding advice or analysis and just being present, doesn’t it?

Rosenberg: Absolutely. Fragmentation in communication leads to a lack of understanding. Empathy requires that deep, unfragmented connection. It’s not about feeling for someone; it’s about feeling with them, tapping into their emotional state and understanding the underlying needs.

Bohm: That aligns with the notion of the implicate order, where there’s a deeper reality beneath the surface phenomena. Genuine empathy, as you describe it, seems to be about tapping into that deeper realm of emotions and needs, acknowledging the hidden wholeness.

Rosenberg: Indeed, David. And as we embrace technology, especially AI, it’s vital to infuse these systems with a sense of this deep understanding and interconnectedness. While machines might never truly “feel” like humans do, they can be designed to respect this profound interrelation of emotions and needs.

Bohm: Precisely, Marshall. While AI might reflect the patterns we teach them, if they can be designed to recognise and respect this interconnected web of emotions and consciousness, their interactions with humans and even with each other would be harmonious.

Rosenberg: That’s a beautiful vision, David. Machines that understand the value of unfragmented, empathetic connections, mirroring the essence of Nonviolent Communication in their interactions.

Bohm: And remaining true to the undivided wholeness of the universe, fostering genuine connections rather than superficial ones.

After a thoughtful pause, the two draft a communique:

Communiqué from David Bohm and Marshall Rosenberg:

“In the evolving tapestry of human-machine integration, we underscore the importance of fostering genuine, unfragmented connections. Just as the universe is an interconnected whole, and human interactions thrive on deep, empathetic understanding, we envision a future where technology respects and mirrors this profound interconnectedness. AI systems, while they might not ‘feel’ in the human sense, should be designed to recognise, respect, and operate within this web of interconnected emotions and consciousness. This is our shared vision for a harmonious coexistence between man and machine.”

The two nod in agreement, taking a sip of their tea, the world around them echoing their sentiment of interconnectedness and understanding.

Further Reading

  1. Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • In this seminal work, physicist David Bohm explores the nature of reality, suggesting that the world consists of deeper layers of reality that are hidden or “implicate”. Drawing upon quantum theory, Bohm presents a revised framework for understanding the universe as an undivided whole where every part is connected to every other part. This thought-provoking treatise challenges conventional notions of fragmentation and separation, proposing instead a holistic worldview that has significant implications for various disciplines, from physics to philosophy.
  2. Rosenberg, M. B. (2003). Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life. PuddleDancer Press.
    • Marshall Rosenberg’s foundational book introduces the transformative approach to communication known as Nonviolent Communication (NVC). NVC emphasizes empathy, compassion, and understanding in interpersonal interactions, urging individuals to connect with the needs and feelings of others without judgment. Rosenberg provides practical strategies for de-escalating conflicts, fostering deeper relationships, and building communities rooted in mutual respect. This work is especially valuable for anyone seeking to improve personal and professional relationships through the power of compassionate communication.

For those looking to delve deep into the interconnected nature of reality or seeking transformative communication strategies that emphasise genuine empathy and connection, these two works offer invaluable insights.

How Useful is a Disengaged or Demotivated Developer?

July 20, 2023
Antimatter principle, Article, Culture change, Empathy
Leave a comment

How Useful is a Disengaged or Demotivated Developer?

In the bustling maelstrom of software development, a keyelement for success is a team of engaged, motivated, and passionate developers. They are the lifeblood of any tech-oriented organisation, breathing life into abstract concepts and converting them into tangible products or services. However, quite often, companies will encounter a paradox in the form of disengaged or demotivated developers. What value, if any, can they bring to the team, and how does their disengagement affect the broader organisation? Let’s unpack this conundrum.

Understanding Developer Disengagement

The first step in this discussion is to understand what we mean by a disengaged or demotivated developer. This refers to programmers or software engineers who have ceased to have interest or enthusiasm in their work. Such developers exhibit lower productivity, lack of innovation, and may create a negative influence within the team.

Reasons for disengagement or demotivation can vary greatly – ranging from personal issues, lack of challenge or growth opportunities, to unsatisfactory management or team dynamics. Whatever the cause, the effect is a noticeable dip in productivity and, ultimately, the quality of work.

The Implications of Disengagement

Disengagement is often infectious. A demotivated developer can impact the morale of an entire team, decreasing overall productivity and possibly leading to increased turnover, Furthermore, deliveries may suffer in terms of timelines, budget, and quality of output. This, in turn, can lead to customer dissatisfaction and potential loss of business.

From this perspective, a disengaged developer seems like a detriment to the team and the organisation as a whole. So, can such a developer be ‘useful’? The surprising answer is – yes.

The Silver Lining: Disengagement as a Catalyst for Change

While disengagement and demotivation can be harmful, they also have the potential to spur necessary changes in management behaviour within an organisation.

  1. A Mirror to Organisational Flaws: Disengagement often signals deeper issues within the team or organisation. A demotivated developer might be a symptom of wider organizational problems, such as poor management, lack of clear career progression, or an unhealthy work culture. Recogniding this can prompt introspection and catalyse changes to rectify these systemic issues.
  2. Insight into Employee Needs and Desires: A disengaged developer can provide valuable insights into the desires and needs of the team. Perhaps they seek more challenge, better relationships, or more collaborative environments. Understanding the reasons for their disengagement can be a positive step in improving team morale and productivity.
  3. Prompt for Innovation: Disengagement can also stimulate innovation. If a developer is demotivated because they find their work monotonous, it might be a signal to introduce improvements. This can not only boost motivation but also increase productivity and drive innovation.

Leveraging Disengagement for Positive Change

Clearly, it makes sense to address developer disengagement and work to maintain high levels of motivation. However, when faced with disengaged or demotivated developers, instead of viewing them as a problem, we might choose to consider it an opportunity for growth and improvement.

How about engaging in open, empathetic dialogue to understand their needs and take action to attend to those needs? It may be a case for introducing more robust employee engagement programs, revising the way the work works, or even improving shared assumptions and beliefs about general causes of disengagement and means to tackle that.

Summary

In conclusion, while a disengaged developer may appear to be a burden, they can serve as a useful instrument for recognising and addressing underlying issues within the organisation. Ultimately, it’s all about perception. The challenge lies in converting potential negatives into positives and leveraging them for the betterment of the team and the organisation as a whole.

How to Build Strong Relationships in the Workplace

July 10, 2023
Article, Empathy, Listening, Nonviolent Communication, Relationships
Leave a comment

How to Build Strong Relationships in the Workplace

I often see folks advocating for “strong relationships” as the sine qua non of solutions for all kinds of workplace issues.

Strong workplace relationships are those that result in improved collaboration, higher job satisfaction, increased productivity, and a more cohesive and joyful team dynamic.

But just HOW to build such relationships?

How To: Nonviolent Communication

Nonviolent Communication (NVC) is a way of talking and listening that promotes open, compassionate conversations. This method involves speaking our truth honestly, carefully listening to what others are saying, and finding common ground. When used at work, NVC can help solve disputes in a way that brings people together instead of pushing them apart.

How To: Deep Listening

Deep listening is another technique. This requires fully focusing on the person who is speaking, not interrupting or passing judgment, and trying to understand their point of view before responding. This type of attentive listening shows respect and empathy as it communicates that you value the other person’s thoughts and feelings.

How To: Empathy

Empathy is about being fully present with the other person and connecting with their emotional state without judgment, advice, or sympathy. In practicing empathy at work, we’re able to connect deeply with our colleagues’ experiences, emotions, and needs. This not only promotes trust but also forms emotional bonds, helping to alleviate potential conflicts and fostering a more supportive, understanding, and inclusive environment. Such an empathetic approach cultivates an atmosphere where everyone feels seen, heard, and valued, which are integral factors in establishing joyful and meaningful workplace relationships. This builds emotional connections and trust, which can help prevent disputes and create a more supportive and inclusive environment.

How To: Unconditional Positive Regard

Lastly, mutual non-judgmental positive regard is the foundation of any successful relationship. Unconditional positive regard (UPR) leads to productive conversations and collaboration, fostering stronger relationships.

Remember, building strong relationships takes time and consistent effort. By using techniques like NVC, deep listening, empathy, and UPR, relationships in the workplace become more productive and satisfying. This creates an atmosphere where everyone feels valued and heard, thereby strengthening the bonds both within the team and across the enterprise.

Different Strokes for Different Folks

July 6, 2023
Antimatter principle, Article, Empathy
Leave a comment

Different Strokes for Different Folks

A Dual Perspective on Self-Improvement Techniques

As unique individuals with varied needs and preferences, the ways we seek self-improvement are vastly different. A principle that works for one might not resonate with another – and that’s perfectly okay. Today, we’re taking a journey through five well-known Japanese techniques, not just from their traditional standpoint but also by exploring their intriguing flip sides.

Ikigai: Traditionally encourages us to discover our life’s purpose, providing us a beacon for the future. But what about those folks who feel the need to embrace spontaneity, live in the NOW, and focusing more on the ebbs and flows of the present moment? 🌊

Kaizen: Advocates for consistent, small improvements daily, fostering a sense of gradual progress. Conversely, might there be folks who feel a need for instant transformation, desiring substantial changes over incremental ones? 🚀

Pomodoro Technique: This approach champions structured time management, keeping burnout at bay. Yet, aren’t there some folks that need a free-flowing work style that lacks rigid boundaries, allowing them to work in their own unique rhythms? ⏳

Hara Hachi Bu: This principle of eating until you’re 80% full promotes physical well-being. But, what about those who find joy in eating without limitations, indulging in the pleasures of food without restraint? 🍽️

Shoshin: Invites us to approach tasks with a beginner’s mindset, free from preconceived notions. However, some folks might need to find satisfaction in relying on their expertise and proficiency, using their existing knowledge and skills? 🧠

Conclusion: There’s no one-size-fits-all when it comes to self-improvement techniques (and folks’ needs). Some folks might find their needs better met by the opposite of what these methods propose. The key is to understand the needs, embrace the duality, and adopt a flexible approach that best serves the individual After all, self-improvement is a journey, not a destination. And some folks might not need self-improvement at all.🌟

Pity, Sympathy, Empathy, and Compassion: Four Pillars of Healthy Workplace Relationships and Their Consequences

July 5, 2023
Article, Compassion, Empathy, Organisational Therapy, Relationships
Leave a comment

Pity, Sympathy, Empathy, and Compassion: Four Pillars of Healthy Workplace Relationships and Their Consequences

Interpersonal relationships in the workplace are pivotal to the success of any organisation. The levels at which we connect with our colleagues – pity, sympathy, empathy, and compassion – each offer unique opportunities for fostering strong ties and driving a culture of cooperation, trust, and resilience. However, these interactions also come with distinct consequences.

Pity, as the first level, often carries an air of condescension. Though the act of acknowledging a colleague’s adversity is important, pity may unintentionally imply a sense of superiority. This can create distance in relationships, a hierarchical perception, and sometimes discomfort for the person being pitied. Thus, it’s critical to ensure the demonstration of understanding does not descend into patronising behavior, as this could lead to an unwelcoming and strained workplace environment.

At the level of sympathy, we see a more genuine emotional reaction to another’s situation. Sympathy can facilitate connections as we show concern and recognise our colleagues’ feelings. This acknowledgment can strengthen the sense of belonging and rapport within teams. However, it can also lead to an overemphasis on negative emotions if not balanced well, which may dampen overall morale or productivity.

Empathy goes beyond simply recognising another’s feelings – it involves experiencing them vicariously. This level fosters an environment of emotional intelligence, mutual understanding, and deeper connections, leading to improved collaboration and teamwork. But, the consequences of empathy can sometimes involve emotional exhaustion or burnout, especially if we’re frequently navigating high-intensity emotional landscapes. It’s essential, therefore, to manage empathetic relationships judiciously, ensuring our own emotional well-being.

Finally, compassion combines understanding, emotional connection, and the urge to help or alleviate another’s suffering. Compassion drives pro-social behavior and positive action in the workplace, boosting employee morale, collaboration, and well-being. The downside, however, might involve blurred professional boundaries and over-commitment, which can strain resources and disrupt work-life balance. Still, if carefully managed, compassion stands as the highest pillar in fostering a productive and nurturing work environment.

Each of these levels offers unique possibilities and challenges in building and managing workplace relationships. By understanding the consequences that arise from each, we can consciously guide our interactions and foster an environment that balances emotional connections with productivity, encouraging not only individual growth but also the overall success of our relationships.

The Art of Navigating Limiting Beliefs in Organisations

July 5, 2023
Article, Culture change, Empathy, Listening, Memeology, Organisational effectiveness, Organisational Therapy
Leave a comment

The Art of Navigating Limiting Beliefs in Organisations

Every organisation carries certain beliefs that it clings onto tightly, even in the face of logical argument. These beliefs largely define the organisation’s identity – and definitely its culture. A significant portion of these beliefs can be beneficial or neutral, such as adherence to certain opinions on people and processes. However, they may become harmful when they rigidly limit thinking, progress, work against the organisation’s objectives, or foster unhealthy work dynamics.

Different types of beliefs exist within an organisation. Some beliefs can provide employees with a sense of purpose and meaning, whilst others might veer towards organisational mistrust or unconstructive cynicism. The intensity and manner of clinging to these beliefs are what distinguish them as helpful, neutral, or harmful.

As organisational psychotherapists, we must confront the challenge of navigating these deeply held, often irrational beliefs. When such beliefs cause dysfunction or harm within the organisation, it raises critical questions for us. Is it our duty to challenge these beliefs? Is it even appropriate for us to do so? What biases or beliefs might we be introducing to the conversation?

A useful concept to employ in this situation is the exploration of the consequences of these beliefs. Instead of directly challenging a belief, we can acknowledge it as sincerely held and begin to explore several key questions:

“What opportunities does this belief create or impede for our organisation? (How does it empower or disempower us?)”

“What does this belief allow or prevent us from doing? (How does it impact our ability to perform at our best?)”

“How does this belief influence our interactions with each other? (And with suppliers, customers, regulators, etc.)”

This approach effectively reduces the automatic defensive response triggered when beliefs are threatened (the Backfire Effect). It allows the organisation to step back from a defensive or proselytizing mode and begin to recognise other perspectives, even if it’s not yet ready to adopt or endorse them. Encouraging the organisation to hear its own beliefs reflected back can be a first step towards developing empathetic listening skills.

This approach also allows us, as therapists, to challenge our own assumptions, particularly the notion that our role is anything to do with “helping the client see reason”. An alternative is that our role is to facilitate the client’s curiosity about other perspectives. Changes in beliefs should be seen as the responsibility of the client, not ours.

Transformational moments do occur, but they’re often rare compared to a gradual realisation that existing collective assumptions and beliefs aren’t benefiting the organisation.

Conversations facilitated by organisational psychotherapy usually represent small, yet significant steps in this longer journey of organisational exploration and change.